Showing posts with label violence. Show all posts
Showing posts with label violence. Show all posts

Saturday, March 28, 2009

Science Saturday: Just A Theory


(http://bloggingheads.tv/diavlogs/18623)

Topics covered:
A sad fate for out-of-work science writers... John oddly cheered by news about prostate exams... George’s sleepover at the Vatican Observatory... The postmodern flavor of Galileo’s persecutors... Ancient violence and the fear of being eaten... Why John’s hoping for the end of war...

Monday, March 9, 2009

Drug Prohibition's Role In Mexico's Violence

From the Cato Institute:



Check out Cato's YouTube channel for more videos like this one.

Thursday, February 19, 2009

CNN: Mexican Drug Violence Likened To "Civil War"

The most mainstream of mainstream media outlets reports:
A shootout in a border city that leaves five alleged drug traffickers sprawled dead on the street and seven police wounded. A police chief and his bodyguards gunned down outside his house in another border city. Four bridges into the United States shut down by protesters who want the military out of their towns and who officials say are backed by narcotraffickers.

...

Mexico, a country with a nearly 2,000-mile border with the United States, is undergoing a horrifying wave of violence that some are likening to a civil war. Drug traffickers battle fiercely with each other and Mexican authorities. The homicide rate reached a record level in 2008 and indications are that the carnage could be exceeded this year.

It's great to see CNN using such strong (and honest!) language. Of course, I've been harping on this issue for some time, writing posts such as "Rampant Drug Violence As A Good Sign? Seriously?" and "Mexico: The Canary In The Coal Mine?". But, regardless of how many times I've already said it, I still feel compelled to say it again: To end the violence, end the drug war. Legalize. Regulate. Tax. Now, now, now.

I don't care what the conventional wisdom is. If we don't change the status quo, the situation in Mexico may soon get far worse. And we really don't want a failed state sharing a nearly 2,000-mile border with us. It's difficult to overstate how bad that would be.

Sunday, February 1, 2009

Phelps Scandal Exposes Government Shills

The Times reports:


Drug claim could spell disaster for Michael Phelps

The world was spellbound for a magical seven days at the Beijing Games as Michael Phelps became the greatest Olympian in history, but today his career could lie in ruins after being pictured allegedly taking drugs.

America woke up to discover that their Olympic hero, whose face smiles from packets of cornflakes on millions of breakfast tables this morning, stands accused of smoking cannabis. Athletes caught using the drug, a banned substance under rules set out by the World Anti-Doping Agency, could face a ban of up to two years.

Who the hell cares?

If anything, smoking pot probably decreases his lung capacity and thus makes him a slower swimmer. So why is this relevant to his competitive sport of choice?

People (often rightly) take note of and (often wrongly) make make a big deal out of counter-cultural bias inherent in alternative media. But stories like this one show that the allegedly neutral mainstream media has a bizarre drive to toe the prohibitionist government line. And worse than that, these deranged anti-marijuana mainstream sources go as far as to present nonsensical moral objections to drug use in the abstract as fact--giving the impression that everyone thinks or ought to think that marijuana use is a bad thing. It's no wonder so many people believe this propaganda when so much of the mainstream media is so happy to shill for it.

This is why I'm optimistic about the death of so many mainstream news outlets. Nothing clears dead wood better than fire. And only when the mass of inanimate clutter is removed can anything new grow in its place.

Update:


Reason.tv at Slamdance: Drug War, Colombia-Style:



It's scandalous that the mainstream media care more about chiding famous athletes for smoking pot than reporting on the horrific violence that the drug war inflicts on innocent Colombians.

Update II:

Slog parses the wording of Phelps' apology:
"I engaged in behaviour which was regrettable and demonstrated bad judgment," Phelps said in a statement to the Associated Press. "I'm 23 years old and despite the successes I've had in the pool, I acted in a youthful and inappropriate way, not in a manner people have come to expect from me. "For this, I am sorry. I promise my fans and the public it will not happen again."

But what does "it" refer to? Smoking pot? Allowing himself to be photographed while smoking pot? Allowing himself to be photographed while smoking pot out of a skank-ass bong? Allowing himself to be forced by finances into making an apology for something he's going to keep doing on a regular basis? Well played, Mr. Phelps.

Thursday, January 15, 2009

Drug War: What Is It Good For?

Radley Balko is one of the most important bloggers out there. Check out his blog and watch this excellent discussion of drug policy in which he participates:


(http://bloggingheads.tv/diavlogs/17092)

Topics covered:

Will ending the Drug War end drug violence?... Radley says legalization will make drug use safer... For a federalist approach to drug laws... Does the Drug War encourage cops to break the law?... David on the particularly intractable meth problem... Making the Drug War less warlike...

Sunday, January 11, 2009

Fighting The Lord’s Resistance Army


(http://bloggingheads.tv/diavlogs/17021)

Topics covered:

Rebel leader Joseph Kony escapes a multinational attack... Why Kony doesn’t want peace... Was Julia wrong to advocate military action against Kony?... The LRA’s horrifying strategic advantage... How the conflict started, and how it might end... The difficult transition from civil war to peace...

Thursday, December 11, 2008

How Ordinary People Become Monsters Or Heroes


(http://www.ted.com/index.php/talks/philip_zimbardo_on_the_psychology_of_evil.html)

About this talk:
Philip Zimbardo knows how easy it is for nice people to turn bad. In this talk, he shares insights and graphic unseen photos from the Abu Ghraib trials. Then he talks about the flip side: how easy it is to be a hero, and how we can rise to the challenge.

More on Zimbardo.

Tuesday, November 4, 2008

Four score and eight years ago...

It has been forty years since the campaign of 1968. A tumultuous political season that saw the assassination of two civil rights leaders. Recently, I watched Emilio Estevez's 2006 film Bobby. Estevez's film about the tangible excitement and hope of the Democratic party - even though it was in theaters before the primary season - could have easily been about the 2008 campaign.

Bobby tells the story of the people on the ground, the Americans caught up in a movement of hope and change for race relations in the United States during the 1968 primary season. Many of the characters are cynical or resistant to change, including minorities. It was hard for me not to create parallels between Robert Kennedy in 1968 and Barack Obama in 2008 and the messages of their respective campaigns.

Tonight, history will be made. America will either elect the first woman Vice-President or the first black President. While this has been a grueling election cycle, hopefully Americans will still be able to take pride in the historical significance of Election Day 2008. Four score and eight years ago, women were finally given an opportunity to become a complete member of our society through the adoption of the 19th Amendment. Forty years later the Civil Rights movement sought to bring equal rights to people of color that were afforded to white Americans. Unfortunately, the assassinations of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. and Robert Kennedy changed the course of not only the movement, but the course of history. Even today many Americans fear Obama will be assassinated simply because he represents change.

Historical moments aside, our next President-elect is going to have lead an extremely polarized populous. Many fear violence tonight regardless of who wins. Again the parallels to the violence of 1968 rears its ugly head. Racial and social tensions still exist in the United States forty years after the Civil Rights movement, as made clear by the smears against both tickets.

In the closing scene of Bobby, Estevez does an amazing job of capturing the shock and fear at the Ambassador Hotel moments after the shooting. You would be hard pressed to find a viewer that didn't get caught up in the fervor and hope of Kennedy's supporters during the Senator's victory speech despite knowing that in a matter of moments he would be gunned down by Sirhan Sirhan and all of the hope in the ballroom would be replaced with fear.

On April 5, 1968, Robert Kennedy gave a speech in Cleveland, Ohio titled "On the Mindless Menace of Violence." Estevez layers audio from this speech over the images of violence in the aftermath of the assassination. To hear Kennedy's voice speak out against violence as you see a dramatization of his last moments is both eerie and profound. I would ask my fellow Americans to consider Senator Kennedy's words today as they vote, tomorrow, over the next four years, and into the unknown future.

Excerpt from "On the Mindless Menace of Violence"
Robert Kennedy
City Club of Cleveland, Cleveland, Ohio
April 5, 1968
(Full speech)

Too often we honor swagger and bluster and wielders of force; too often we excuse those who are willing to build their own lives on the shattered dreams of others. Some Americans who preach non-violence abroad fail to practice it here at home. Some who accuse others of inciting riots have by their own conduct invited them.

Some look for scapegoats, others look for conspiracies, but this much is clear: violence breeds violence, repression brings retaliation, and only a cleansing of our whole society can remove this sickness from our soul.

For there is another kind of violence, slower but just as deadly destructive as the shot or the bomb in the night. This is the violence of institutions; indifference and inaction and slow decay. This is the violence that afflicts the poor, that poisons relations between men because their skin has different colors. This is the slow destruction of a child by hunger, and schools without books and homes without heat in the winter.

This is the breaking of a man's spirit by denying him the chance to stand as a father and as a man among other men. And this too afflicts us all.

I have not come here to propose a set of specific remedies nor is there a single set. For a broad and adequate outline we know what must be done. When you teach a man to hate and fear his brother, when you teach that he is a lesser man because of his color or his beliefs or the policies he pursues, when you teach that those who differ from you threaten your freedom or your job or your family, then you also learn to confront others not as fellow citizens but as enemies, to be met not with cooperation but with conquest; to be subjugated and mastered.

We learn, at the last, to look at our brothers as aliens, men with whom we share a city, but not a community; men bound to us in common dwelling, but not in common effort. We learn to share only a common fear, only a common desire to retreat from each other, only a common impulse to meet disagreement with force. For all this, there are no final answers.

Yet we know what we must do. It is to achieve true justice among our fellow citizens. The question is not what programs we should seek to enact. The question is whether we can find in our own midst and in our own hearts that leadership of humane purpose that will recognize the terrible truths of our existence.

We must admit the vanity of our false distinctions among men and learn to find our own advancement in the search for the advancement of others. We must admit in ourselves that our own children's future cannot be built on the misfortunes of others. We must recognize that this short life can neither be ennobled or enriched by hatred or revenge.

Our lives on this planet are too short and the work to be done too great to let this spirit flourish any longer in our land. Of course we cannot vanquish it with a program, nor with a resolution.

But we can perhaps remember, if only for a time, that those who live with us are our brothers, that they share with us the same short moment of life; that they seek, as do we, nothing but the chance to live out their lives in purpose and in happiness, winning what satisfaction and fulfillment they can.

Surely, this bond of common faith, this bond of common goal, can begin to teach us something. Surely, we can learn, at least, to look at those around us as fellow men, and surely we can begin to work a little harder to bind up the wounds among us and to become in our own hearts brothers and countrymen once again.