Showing posts with label christopher's ramblings. Show all posts
Showing posts with label christopher's ramblings. Show all posts

Tuesday, April 7, 2009

It's Time To Get Perverted

My new blog, Perverted Minority, is now fully functional. Come check it out. Here's the tagline, which explains the name:
Right-wing culture warriors are the real perverted minority. They doth protest too much against gays, recreational drug users, and other alleged degenerates. Having no regard for privacy or basic decency, they obsess voyeuristically over other people's personal lives to such an extent that they barely seem able to think about anything else.

I do still have a weekly column every Friday in the Daily Iowan. So please continue to read that as well. But this is my final posting here, so over and out.

Wednesday, April 1, 2009

Christopher Patton Has A New Blog


Due to concerns about editorial control and intellectual property rights, I will no longer be blogging here at the Podium. Instead, I'm launching a new blog called "Perverted Minority." That site should be up and running later today. Click here to check it out.

Thursday, March 19, 2009

The Podium Now Contains 1,000 Posts

This post marks the 1,000th time this blog has been updated. A pretty substantial number of those posts are mine. So hurray, I guess.

I really enjoy writing here. Thanks, readers, for your attention. Your hits show up in my Google Analytics account, so I know how many people are listening in on all my ranting. Keep it coming. And spread the word.

If you enjoy this site, then link to it on Facebook and other social media venues. Traditional, real-world word of mouth is great, too. If everyone chips in, I'm confident we can significantly increase our hit count this month. Please and thanks.

Sunday, March 8, 2009

Sorry About The Lack Of Posts This Weekend

I'll be back in full force tomorrow, starting with the extra material I couldn't fit into my Salvia column on Friday.

In the meantime, enjoy this installment of xkcd:



I'm not willing to concede that my lack of posting this weekend is causally related to the fun I had, but I will admit that there was at least a correlation.

Update:

The extra Salvia content is going to have to wait another day. Hopefully, the massive culling I engaged in today regarding who I follow on Google Reader and Twitter will help free up more of my time.

Tuesday, January 20, 2009

Satellite Image Of Inauguration

From one of Google's blogs:
We just received a spectacular overhead shot of the National Mall during the Inauguration from our satellite imagery partner GeoEye. This gorgeous satellite view of the ceremony was taken at 11:19am (Eastern) by the GeoEye-1 satellite as it passed overhead. To see this amazing image download this KML and open it up in Google Earth -- here is a preview of what you'll see:



We are ants.

Sunday, January 18, 2009

A Note On My Writing Style

New commenter "Iowa" responded to my post "Chicken Taco Has Beef With Me" with the following:
Congrats to taco for rubbing Chris's rubarb the wrong way enough that he actually took the time to post this.

Holy Schnikes Chris, how immature are you? Are you now gonna cry to mommy? Way to abuse this form Einstein. Go ahead, respond, you always do. I never thought I'd say this, but you and Bill O'Reilly have A LOT incommon.

Taco, email me at

iowaindependent542@gmail.com

I may have some work for you (seriously, it's a real offer) are you appear astute at challenging some of the odd conjectures Chris makes. However taco if you want Chris to go away I recommend you just ignore him from here on out, just don't comment on his nonsense, only on his worthwhile articles (which for the record Chris absolutely exist, there are some things you write that are decent quality). Or if you want Chris to go away just don't comment on his stuff.

Best to all, I got a football game to watch. Always have fun debating.

I really do need to more carefully explain my intent sometimes. I'm not in any way actually angry with "taco." I've been very much entertained by the lively exchange we've been having. If I didn't enjoy it, I wouldn't do it.

This whole blog (and most of what I write) is a giant free-form experiment in new media. I generally mean what I say, but I also often engage in intellectual play. Thus, I don't feel the need to apologize to anyone if something I produce offends him or her--if you don't like it, stop reading it. However, criticism (constructive or otherwise) is always welcome.

As for the comparison between Bill O'Reilly and me, I can't say I disagree. There are times when I write in a voice somewhat like his. But I don't always write in that voice and I certainly don't usually talk like that in person. Face-to-face conversations are very socially different than snarky online banter. I really like experimenting with different writing voices.

Finally, I've never said all journalists should write the way I do. I think there's plenty of space for diversity in the modern digital media ecosystem. I'm just trying to find my niche.

Tuesday, December 9, 2008

More On How To Profit From Free Online Content

Many bands have taken to giving their music away as free digital files and instead focusing on getting more revenue of out merchandise sales and some other content creators are trying something similar.

Wired reports:
In 2003, Burnie Burns got together with three friends and created Red vs. Blue—an animated comedy series set in the world of first-person shooter Halo. Nerds loved it, and within months nearly a million people were downloading each week's free show.

Burns & Co. decided they wanted to quit their jobs and work on the series full-time. So they figured out a way to do it: T-shirts.

Burns appropriated the comedy's wittiest one-liners and set up an online store to sell shirts and caps. Within months, he was filling hundreds of orders a week, generating enough revenue to pay everyone a salary. "The shirts," he says, "turned us from a hobby into a business."

Continue reading.

This ought not be surprising since the challenges the music and all other content-creation industries are facing have the same root cause: the radical decrease in the cost of transmitting information--a decrease to effectively zero. And if your business model relies on attempting to sell an infinitely available resource, I'm afraid the law of supply and demand is likely to wipe you out with cruel and efficient speed. Hence the need for new business models.

Also, taking another page from the music performance business, perhaps offering live interaction with one's audience will become another major way of boosting readership (and then, hopefully, ad revenue as well) for electronic publications. Out in Seattle, The Stranger seems to be trying this out with its Slog Happy events.

Finally, the New York Times' Bits blog made the same connection I did between yesterday's news of the Tribume Company's implosion and the ongoing advances in electronic paper technology. But my post went up first. Score one for me. Though I'd be even more excited about it if I had anything approaching their readership.

Update:

Google blasts full steam ahead into the world of magazines:

The word "magazine" is derived from the Arabic word "makhazin," meaning storehouse. Since Daniel Defoe published the world's first English magazine back in 1704, millions of magazines catering to nearly every imaginable taste have been created and consumed, passed from person to person in cafes, barber shops, libraries, and homes around the world. If you're wondering what cars people drove in the eighties or what was in fashion thirty years ago, there's a good chance that you'll find that answer in a magazine. Yet few magazine archives are currently available online.

Today, we're announcing an initiative to help bring more magazine archives and current magazines online, partnering with publishers to begin digitizing millions of articles from titles as diverse as New York Magazine, Popular Mechanics, and Ebony. Are you a baseball history fanatic? Try a search for [hank aaron catching babe] on Google Book Search. You'll find a link to a 1973 Ebony article about Hank Aaron, written as he closed in on Babe Ruth's original record for career home runs. You can read the article in full color and in its original context, just as you would in the printed magazine. Scroll back a few pages, for example, and you'll find a two-page spread on 1973's fall fashions. If you'd like to read further, you can click on "Browse all issues" to view issues from across the decades.

Continue reading.

No corner of the information/entertainment industry will remain untouched by the digital revolution. Newspapers, magazines, and even books will all primarily be read on electronic paper in the near future. And Google will of course index it all, making all the world's information accessible wherever one happens to be. Eat your heart out, Gutenberg.

Monday, December 8, 2008

Electronic Newspaper Business Models

Expanding on my post about the transition from print to electronic media from earlier today (Print Is Doomed, Electronic Media Set To Boom)...

So, how will outlets publishing exclusively via electronic mediums make money?

Aside from advertising revenue, which should be a major component, micro-payments should in principle be able to go a long way toward paying writers', editors', photographers', etc. salaries. Particularly small outfits could even outsource their advertising sales departments to auction-based ad market brokers such as Google with its AdSense and AdWords programs. However, such outsourcing means paying the broker a substantial portion of ad revenue, so larger organizations will likely continue to sell at least some of their own ads.

People working in public radio are already discussing how to use micro-payments to get donations from people who wish to give a small amount and/or remain anonymous:

The social media folks have spoken: Us pub media folks need to get serious about micro-pledging. We need to make it seamless and convenient and free of fear that an act of generosity will reap paper avalanching through the mail slot.

To wit:
micro-payments could be huge. i’d talk to paypall (or whoever else does these), and see if they could facilitate micro-payment fund raising - in form of a website widget.

many people don’t like donations because they have to disclose to much personal information, and then they end up on mailing/calling lists and get harassed by everyone. anonymous micro-donations would take care of that problem.

Continue reading.

Smaller outlets will also be able to outsource management of micro-payments to specialized businesses. In a comment to the above post, a person representing one such company posted a link to its site: http://www.fatfoogoo.com/. This service is apparently primarily aimed at online game businesses, but something very much like it could operate effectively for micro-payments to voluntarily subsidize media content. Though some publications can and do sustain themselves largely on support from just a few big donors, being able to rely on an army of small donors keeps one out of the mercy of such big spenders.

So, to sum up, electronic newspapers will publish their content in an open format that is easily viewed on any type of flexible or traditional screen. Along with the media, there will be ads, likely in text, audio, and video form. But there will also be a beckoning little "donate" button at the bottom of each story--or end of each slide show or video. People can click it and pay whatever they want for what they just saw.

Some will no doubt protest that people deserve to be able to set their own prices and charge a flat subscription fee. And businesses can indeed attempt to do so if they desire--no doubt some people will continue to pay in this way. But it seems as though it will get increasingly difficult for businesses to pull in sufficient subscribers in this manner. As writer and technologist Cory Doctorow argues, in the new media world obscurity is perhaps the greatest threat to a publication. Thus, giving away content in order to attract an audience may be the best option.

Oh, and finally, this has nothing to do with some sort of silly "blogs vs. newspapers" notion. Blogs and newspapers serve different functions. Neither one is going away. They'll just both (along with all sorts of things we can barely imagine at this point) be published via electronic paper-based technology.

Wake up, people, this is much bigger than different types of publications vying for market share. This is as big as the shift from scribes to printing presses.

Business is all but destined to be a bit shaky for a while, but such major changes are never totally smooth. The future wouldn't be interesting if it weren't challenging. And it would be far worse if the status quo in American media appeared strong enough to continue indefinitely.

Friday, December 5, 2008

Society's Future Immune System: Technology

Armed with nothing but standard black-market weapons and consumer electronics, a small group of dedicated attackers was recently able to shut down Mumbai, India, for several days. And, disturbingly, there's little reason to think the same thing couldn't happen in an American city.

Civilian police forces aren't trained or equipped to deal with such brazen commando-style raids, and trying to change that would be pointless. There simply aren't enough resources available to militarize our cities to that extent. Not to mention that doing so could have dire long-term consequences for civil liberties and democracy.

So what should we do instead? The best place to start is to look at what happened in Mumbai.

Long before the Indian authorities had any idea what was happening, average citizens stepped up and worked to save hundreds of lives. One man, working in a train station that was attacked, saw a way for many of the people there to escape through an exit at the opposite end of the station from where the gunmen had entered. Rather than fleeing immediately, this man risked his own life to get on the station's loudspeakers and tell the frightened crowd where to go. Also, in one of the hotels that came under siege, the staff shepherded numerous guests to safety through a series of service corridors and rooms only they knew about.

The Mumbai attack also decisively proved the usefulness of social media in disbursing vital information efficiently. Just as modest service employees were able to act more quickly and possibly save more lives than trained security forces, citizen journalists were able to get the word out much faster than the mainstream media. As the assault on the city was unfolding, people there and around the world could follow the latest developments in real time on Twitter, a micro-blogging service that allows people to send and receive short messages on their cell phones or computers. The wire services that used to break news were left in the dust.

Importantly, all of these amazing organic responses to the horror in Mumbai happened without any planning whatsoever. This is key, because being able to respond dynamically to unexpected threats is the only effective way to minimize the harm potentially unpredictable attacks can cause.

As technology continues to become simultaneously more powerful, cheaper, and easier to use, radical groups are going to be able to pull off increasingly destructive strikes. Electronics such as satellite phones and GPS units allowed the 10 or so men who brought Mumbai to its knees to coordinate with each other more effectively than even elite militaries could until quite recently. And given the rapid advances in desktop manufacturing, within the next decade or two, malevolent individuals will likely be able to produce deadly weapons such as automatic firearms and explosives for themselves using abundantly available materials.

Rather than faithfully entrusting our collective security to increasingly outdated bureaucracies that process information and act too slowly to respond effectively to rapidly emerging new threats, our society must focus on becoming more connected, flexible, and resilient.

Thankfully, technology's relentless advance provides us with just as many tools for good as for ill. For example, cell phones and other mobile devices provide the perfect infrastructure to build on. Soon, it will be technically and economically feasible to integrate sensors into such devices that could detect radiation, dangerous chemicals, and other hazards. Combined with a system that would allow people to share information such as the locations and activities of armed attackers with law enforcement as well as each other, such a network of smart devices could act like a city's immune system. As soon as harmful intruders are detected, information about what they are doing and where they are going could quickly be disseminated throughout the entire population. This would allow people to be sufficiently informed to get out of harm's way even in the heat of a chaotic and unexpected crisis.

No matter what, extremists who desire to sow widespread panic and destruction will keep using cutting-edge technology to achieve their goals. Governments around the world need to embrace that same technology in order to facilitate more dynamic responses to such aggressive actions. And if they fail to do so, private citizens will need to come together and do it for ourselves.

(Cross-posted at the DI's main site.)

Those who find these ideas interesting would probably also want to check out these sites, from which I obtained much of the background information for this column:
- Global Guerrillas
- Wired: Danger Room
- Wired: Threat Level
- Responsible Nanotechnology
- Kurzweil AI
- The FASTforward Blog

Thursday, December 4, 2008

An Open Letter To Bathroom Slobs

To whom it may concern:

Everyone has to use public restrooms. That's why we call them "public." So stop defiling them with your filth.

In case you are unaware of the standards of common decency, here are a few examples of things not to do in a public restroom:
- Neglecting to flush a toilet--particularly if you've shat in it.
- Pissing on a toilet seat.
- Leaving tissues, newspapers, or other assorted trash all over the floor.
- Spitting gum in a urinal or sink.
- Splashing a large amount of water onto the counter around a sink.

You can be extremely glad that I do not have dictatorial powers. If I did, I would make all of you damned philistines clean up the messes you leave with your tongues. Repeat offenders would be exiled from civilized society and left to die in the wilderness where scavengers could at least make use of their corpses.

Please, do your part to help forestall my murderous rage--simply don't be an inconsiderate slob.

Sincerely,

Christopher Patton

Monday, December 1, 2008

Yet More Discussion Of The Internet's Power

Facebook reports on its corporate blog:
We've talked before about the massive amount of data running through Facebook's systems. We have Lexicon to help visualize what people are talking about on the site, but we don't yet have any similar, graphics-driven way to show the site's constant activity and connections. Taking a break from my normal job (if dealing with Facebook's massive scalability challenges counts as normal) at the most recent hackathon, I decided to brush off my graphics abilities and work on something more visual.

I focused on a project known as Palantir. We're still experimenting with it, but the idea is to show Facebook in action, with people's interactions speeding across a computer model of the earth, as if friend requests, messages or photo-sharing exchanges were bursts of light or airplanes flying to their destinations.

Continue reading.

You can also check out this video they've posted, which you can watch even without a Facebook account:

http://www.facebook.com/video/video.php?v=37403547074

This scale of interaction is radically unprecedented. The relevancy of physical location to social interaction is rapidly decreasing. And we've only seen the tip of the iceberg.

Fuck Everyone: A Candid and Fanciful E-mail Exchange

My friend "Paul Sawyer" e-mailed me the following message this morning:
I'm frankly losing my patience with the insane conventional wisdom plaguing our consciousness. Last year, when I was an unabashed Ron Paul supporter (before the whole racist cracker shit came to light), the only guy who seemed to possess anything approaching a grip on reality, at least when it came to the economy, was Paul's economic adviser Peter Schiff. Of course, he was ridiculed, marginalized, and laughed at by pretty much everyone. Which, at the time, was pretty annoying. But now going back and hearing/reading what he said in '06 and and '07, the "chicken little" accusations spewed unthinkingly in his direction is nothing short of infuriating. (Though "infuriating" probably isn't a strong enough word).

Ah, but I'm reminded of an Arthur Schopenhauer quote:

"All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident."

In other words, it's not as if this is anything new. So I should probably calm the fuck down.

Anyway, this assemblage of clips is pretty effective in conveying this phenomenon:



Jesus, people are fucking stupid.

I responded:
Fuck everyone, indeed. Because everyone is fucked.

Read these two blog posts:
http://blog.wired.com/defense/2008/12/the-gagdets-of.html
http://blog.wired.com/defense/2008/12/mumbai-terroris.html

And then check out all the recent posts on this blog:

http://globalguerrillas.typepad.com/globalguerrillas/

It's only going to get easier and easier to create this kind of chaos. I hope I'm wrong, but I think an attack very much like the one in Mumbai is likely to occur in the US within the next decade. Our entire security bureaucracy is an enormous waste of money. Nothing that the US government has done after 9/11 would help at all in dealing with a situation like this. All it's done is waste trillions of dollars and significantly erode our core civil liberties. Based on what we've seen thus far, there's little reason to hope nation states will start reacting smarter anytime soon. Instead they'll continue to flail and waste money as they become increasing authoritarian. And when they finally collapse? Who the hell knows. But we're probably all fucked.

I then added:
And then there's this:

http://www.theagitator.com/2008/12/01/posse-commitatus-rip/

Jesus.

And this:
And I would also like to point out that this deployment will do virtually nothing to help protect against the kind of attack recently seen in Mumbai.

To which he responded:
Maybe we're just being crazy/paranoid. Imaginations run amok. I sure hope so.
It's not like we're in danger of being rounded up en masse and put in concentration camps or some kind of weird gulag. Other than the docile majority, no one would stand for it. And it's logistically impossible. I mean, where the fuck would they put us? Oh. Right. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rex_84

But let's be real here: it's unlikely that the leaders of the American Shadow Government and their hired guns (the CIA) are that evil. They're people, too. With families and dogs and mortgages. It's doubtful they'd seriously consider killing/detaining their own citizens to retain a power-strangle. There's simply no historic precedent for that kind of thinking. Not within our government, anyway. Except maybe this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Northwoods

Ah, but all this is bullshit. The CIA is answerable to the president (he is, after all, the commander in chief) and must keep Congress afoot of their goings on. And we have a new, and by all accounts constitutionally-friendly sheriff in town in Obama. A Shadow Government is impossible to maintain with citizen-elected oversight in place.

Wait. What's that? The CIA stopped answering to the president and briefing Congress in 2004? Why didn't I read about this at the time? Why isn't this in history books? Well, sheesh, ain't that a bitch?!

"Previously, the Director of Central Intelligence (DCI) oversaw the Intelligence Community, serving as the president's principal intelligence advisor, additionally serving as head of the Central Intelligence Agency. The DCI's title now is "Director of the Central Intelligence Agency" (DCIA), serving as head of the CIA.

Currently, the Central Intelligence Agency reports to the Director of National Intelligence. Prior to the establishment of the DNI, the CIA reported to the President, with informational briefings to U.S. Congressional committees. The National Security Advisor is a permanent member of the National Security Council, responsible for briefing the President with pertinent information collected by all U.S. intelligence agencies, including the National Security Agency, the Drug Enforcement Administration, et cetera; all sixteen Intelligence Community agencies are under the authority of the Director of National Intelligence."

[cribbed from Wikipedia]

Of course, I don't necessarily actually hold all of the views I expressed in that exchange. My friend and I like to play rhetorical games and engage in fierce philosophical jousting, where each of us enjoys playing devil's advocate. But these are all ideas bouncing around in my head and I deemed them worth sharing.

More On Internet-enabled Social Organization

YouTube reports on its corporate blog:
Starting today, musicians around the world can submit audition videos to www.youtube.com/symphony for a chance to participate in the YouTube Symphony Orchestra and summit, the world's first collaborative online orchestra connecting aspiring musicians with leaders and stars in the classical world. The first YouTube program of its kind, the YouTube Symphony Orchestra will transform individual performances into a global symphony and change the way musicians connect over the Internet. This is your opportunity to perform alongside world-renowned conductor Michael Tilson Thomas, learn from composer Tan Dun and many members of the London Symphony Orchestra, consult with pianist Lang Lang, and collaborate with YouTube users from around the globe. Selected musicians will have the honor of participating in an April 2009 summit where you'll learn from today's classical masters before stepping out at New York City's Carnegie Hall for a performance.

Continue reading.

They also, unsurprisingly, embedded two videos in their post--this is one of them:



Anyway, I don't care about this particular contest--only the method of recruitment and organization enabled by YouTube's existence. Such a contest wouldn't have been possible just a few years ago. So what else will such technology enable? What will the long-term social, economic, and political effects be? Good questions.

Change France Can Believe In


(Via Andrew Sullivan.)

This just goes to show how quickly memes travel now. The potential for major political changes on a global scale is increasing as the information revolution continues to transform the world. And with all this financial and security chaos... Might there be a willingness to accept new authority in exchange for stability and safety?

It's not as though our current nation state system has existed for all that long in historical terms. Who's to say it's going to last the next century? But what would replace it? Good questions.

Tuesday, November 4, 2008

I'm Nervous

Not about the results of the presidential election, but about Prop 8 in California. Hopefully, a bunch of bigoted Mormons and other far-right fundies aren't able to end marriage equality in that state. In any case, I've done what little I could for the cause.

Seriously, words cannot describe how upset I'll be if that stupid ballot initiative passes. And I'll already be well pickled with whiskey by the time I find out, so any inhibitions I might otherwise have will be pretty much gone. So whether it passes or not I'll likely cry and scream--only the emotions behind those actions are really in doubt.

Come see the shit show in person: Dublin Underground, 5 S. Dubuque, 7:30 pm on...

Update:

More on those damn Mormons...


(Via Slog.)

Enough With The Bullshit

I've had it with all this feel-good get-out-the-vote crap.

It seems that everywhere I turn I see another blog post or Facebook status update proclaiming: "It doesn't matter who you vote for! Just vote! It's your duty!"

Bullshit, bullshit, bullshit!

First, voting is not a duty. The right not to vote is just as sacred as the right to vote.

Second, if you haven't yet educated yourself about the relevant candidates and issues, then you should stay home. I don't care what you think and no one else should either.

Third, the results of this election matter and the results are determined by people's votes. So it does matter who you vote for.

And I want Barack Obama to win and Bob Barr to get as much support as possible. Thus, if you're not voting for one of those two people, I don't think you should vote. Instead, you should sit at home, watch Fox News, and keep your fucking illogical, ignorant, and/or idiotic opinions to yourself.

Please, everyone, stop with the inane nonpartisan drivel. Please. This is election day. In each contest to be decided today, one party will win and the other will lose. This is the most partisan day of the whole damned year. Period. Get over it.

For an even more vitriolic and profanity-filled experience, join me and most (if not all) of the rest of the Daily Iowan's editorial board at the Dublin Underground, 5 S. Dubuque, tonight. I'll be there around 7:30 pm.

Wednesday, October 8, 2008

Republicans Despair

From the National Review via Slog:
Well I have gone outside and pulled up my Mcain/Palin sign. This election is over. I will vote for Mcain but I know that come Nov. 5 Obama will be our president-elect.

I feel sorry for Sarah Palin. A once promising career will be permanently connected to the landside loss of John McCain.

I weep for my children and their families.

I try not to be one to county my chickens, but... Ha-ha!!! Sixty-point spread here we come:



Die, Republican Party, die! Burn, burn, burn! There are plenty of young people who are actually fiscally conservative who would love to build a new coalition on your smoldering ashes. We just need the rotten old tree to fall before we can get enough light and space to grow up as its replacement.

Barry Goldwater Is Spinning In His Grave

Reason's Matt Welch writes: I Would Just Like to Point out That John McCain Tonight Proposed Nationalizing All Bad Mortgages:
So, what other economic Hail Marys can we expect to see before Election Day? Guaranteed federal insurance for those who bet it all on red? A new green job from Barack Obama for every American who reduces his or her carbon footprint? McCain offers to nationalize Starbucks because "they just don't seem to be doing as well these days"?

And John McCain claims to be Barry Goldwater's heir how? Oh where, oh where have the real conservatives gone? Apparently, the Libertarians are the only limited-government advocates left standing.

So here's my fantasy: The Democrats crush the Republicans in the next several elections. The Republican Party goes down in flames. The Libertarian Party moves to the center enough to supplant the Republican Party in America's two-party system. The Republicans stick around but are the perpetual third party, drawing only a few percentage points of electoral support from the fundamentalist troglodytes who refuse to let go of their pre-modern religiously based morality. Then, the Libertarians and the Democrats could get back to the business of having serious arguments about how best to advance our collective interests. The political debate would always be about finding a compromise between those who advocate liberty and those who advocate equality. And all the provincial bigots would be left on the sidelines to scream themselves hoarse.

I'm skeptical this is going to happen. But I can hope. That would be the kind of change I would believe in.

Update:

This just in from a McCain campaign e-mail:
AMERICAN HOMEOWNERSHIP RESURGENCE PLAN

Tonight John McCain announced his plan to keep families in their homes, avoid foreclosures, save failing neighborhoods, stabilize the housing market and attack the roots of our financial crisis.

The McCain Resurgence Plan would purchase mortgages directly from homeowners and mortgage servicers, and replace them with manageable, fixed-rate mortgages that will keep families in their homes. By purchasing the existing, failing mortgages the McCain resurgence plan will eliminate uncertainty over defaults, support the value of mortgage-backed derivatives and alleviate risks that are freezing financial markets.

The McCain resurgence plan would be available to mortgage holders that:
Live in the home (primary residence only)
Can prove their creditworthiness at the time of the original loan (no falsifications and provided a down payment).

The new mortgage would be an FHA-guaranteed fixed-rate mortgage at terms manageable for the homeowner. The direct cost of this plan would be roughly $300 billion because the purchase of mortgages would relieve homeowners of "negative equity" in some homes.

Funds provided by Congress in the recent financial market stabilization bill can be used for this purpose; indeed by stabilizing mortgages it will likely be possible to avoid some purposes previously assumed needed in that bill. The plan could be implemented quickly as a result of the authorities provided in the stabilization bill, the recent housing bill, and the U.S. government's conservatorship of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. It may be necessary for Congress to raise the overall borrowing limit.

So, yes, now someone claiming to be a limited-government conservative is advocating yet another massive government intervention into the housing market. Because the government's past meddling in that area has had such great results. Too bad saying that the libertarians told you so doesn't suffice to fix the current mess.

Oh where, oh where have the fiscal conservatives gone?

Tuesday, September 23, 2008

Despite Economic Problems, the Noosphere Keeps Expanding

Wired reports:
The financial markets are on the verge of implosion and the economy looks like it's going to hell, but online video is still growing at a ridiculous rate.

...

"The cat is out of the bag," says Mark Trefgarne, CEO of LiveRail, an online video advertising company. "The networks have accepted that the internet is the future. If ad revenue slows down, I don't think it's going to necessarily hinder their long-term view of the medium. No executive of a major media company who takes their job seriously would say, 'Ad revenue won't keep up with costs, therefore we won't expand online.' This is the time that they need to build a position online."

As more and more of what happens in the world is permanently stored online in an easily retrievable format, a sort of collective memory is growing. Currently, accessing the exact video clip that one wants can still be challenging even if it is online. However, as Google and other major players in this field continue to push forward with new technology at a breakneck pace, that will soon change. The ability to search through our enormous and growing archive of footage with high accuracy using the words people speak in videos or even objects that appear in those videos will be available soon.

And before too long most people's accessories such as phones and glasses will come standard with high definition video cameras embedded in them. Given how much faster wireless Internet access is getting, it won't be long after that that people will be able to get that content online in real time. It's a good thing that storage capacity and its price performance are growing exponentially. This means that, as difficult as it is to believe, we are unlikely to ever run out of space. Thus, we will ultimately have virtually unlimited access to virtually everything that happens in public places where significant numbers of people are present.

Of course we mere humans will only have access to that information when we look for it; however, the coming intelligent cloud will have constant access. It will be almost omniscient and omnipresent. And those are two of the three most common attributes that God is supposed to have.

Sunday, September 21, 2008

The Internet of Things

Slashdot reports:
This week, a group of leading technology vendors that include Cisco, Sun, Ericsson, Atmel, Freescale, and embedded open source developers, founded the Internet Protocol for Smart Objects Alliance to promote the 'Internet of Things,' in which everyday objects such as thermometers, radiators, and light switches are given IP addresses and are connected to the Internet. Such IP-enabled 'smart objects' give rise to a wide range of applications, from energy-efficient homes and offices to factory equipment maintenance and hospital patient monitoring.

Here's Google Tech Talk video of a lecture about the possible uses of an Internet of Things:

(http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7gntV6AePOM)

So what does this mean for you? In ten years if you misplace your shoes you'll probably be able to find out where they are by asking Google. Which will be pretty awesome as long as there are privacy protections that prevent everyone else from knowing where your shoes are at all times.

In any case, this is just one more example of how the Internet is going to merge with the real world and how Google will become God. So just go about your days as normal. Nothing to see here. But one day we'll all wake up and wonder when everything got so damn strange.